Tuesday, July 3, 2012

Book: Sacre Bleu


Cover of Sacre Bleu featuring Toulouse-
Lautrec and Bleu
Book: Sacre Bleu: A Comedy D'Art

Author: Christopher Moore

Publisher: HarperCollins Publisher

Year: April 2012


I have started and stopped this review at least a dozen times. I have been struggling to find the right words to describe this book.

What began so well quickly went downhill at an alarmingly fast pace. Should I’ve been surprised? Probably not since Playboy was quoted on the back cover stating, “If there’s a funnier writer out there, step forward.” Should have been my first clue.

Like I said, it started interestingly enough. As someone who studied art history throughout high school and parts of university, I was intrigued by the storyline. It begins with the death of Vincent van Gogh. Van Gogh famously shot himself in 1890 in a field. However no gun was ever retrieved from the site and van Gogh stumbled back to a small French village to die. This is where Moore’s story begins.

Using a fictional main character, Lucien Lessard is a baker by profession and struggling artist by passion. Upon receiving the news of van Gogh’s death, Lucien and his friend Henri Toulouse-Lautrec quickly become suspicious of the circumstances of van Gogh's death. Was it just made to look like a suicide?

Henri Toulouse-Lautrec is just one of the many real-life artists of this period that Moore uses throughout his novel. Some others include Renoir, Pissarro, Manet, Seurat, Monet, Whistler, Cézanne and many more. Their paintings are scattered throughout the story.

Sacre Bleu may also sound familiar to readers. I remember hearing it in a movie as a kid and getting scolded at by mother for repeating it. I later learned it was a French curse word, but it wasn’t until this book that I learned its true meaning. Sacre Bleu refers to the blue cloak that was painted on the Virgin Mary. During the 13th century, it became popular for artists to use expensive and rare ultramarine blue for the painting of Mary’s robe.

These 19th century artists used what was referred to as a colorman to get the colors they needed for their paintings. In Moore’s story, he creates a crooked, little colorman who has weaved his way through all these famous artists’ lives and paintings. Lucien and Toulouse-Lautrec begin to track down their artist friends and discover that each artist had a muse that they were completely enamoured with though their memories are distorted and where the paintings disappeared to is a mystery to them.

Where this story begins to unravel is with the element of magical powers this colorman possesses. Though I have some imagination with stories that use magical elements, Moore leaves out a lot of details and doesn’t explain properly how the Colorman has been affecting famous artists for centuries. Bleu is a spirit/sidekick who becomes these famous muses in all the paintings. As long as the Colorman has some of his ultramarine, Bleu can keep entering new bodies to inspire these artists.

There is a serious lack of flow with the character Bleu. Sometimes she is good and sometimes she bad. As a reader, you are always questioning her motives especially with Lucien. She inspires Lucien through his former love, Juliette.

This novel is supposed to be comical, but it often comes off as crude. Using the word “fuck” to describe every sex scene just seems like a writer who lacks creativity and is just being lazy.

Overall, I would suggest this book with caution. What began as interesting became a nightly punishment to finish.

Map of Paris


Friday, June 29, 2012

Book Club Book: Not Wanted on the Voyage

Book: Not Wanted on the Voyage
``...went in two and two unto Noah into the ark...``
Author: Timothy Findley
Publisher: Viking Canada
Year: 1984


Can you imagine being one of the chosen few to land a coveted ticket on Noah's Ark? What an honour that would be. The entire population is going to wash away and you scored big by being part of the chosen family by God to carry on the human and animal race. While according to Timothy Findley's version of the famous tale, most of the people chosen would have rather been washed away.


Findley (1930-2002) tells his own version of the tale using the Noyes family. The world has become corrupt and God chooses Noah Noyes and his family to carry on. Unlike the Biblical version, this one focuses more on characters.


Main Characters:



Noah: Known as Doctor Noyes, Noah is portrayed a tyrannical ass. Hard on his sons, demeaning towards his daughter-in-laws, and completely disrespectful to his wife, the reader completely looses respect for the aging patriarch from the start. His cat lives in complete fear of him, as he is notorious for using kittens for scientific experiments. As the book progresses, it is discovered that Noah is sexually assaulting his daughter-in-laws and is also becoming senile in the process.



God: God is roughly 700 years old at this point according to Findley. His character is portrayed as tired, cranky, and downtrodden by the current situation on Earth. A flood seems like the easiest solution to eliminate the world's corruption and sins. However it seems like the choosing of the Noyes family is solely based on a past friendship with Noah. At least that is the only way to explain why anyone would choose this dysfunctional family to carry on the human race or maybe its just Findley’s way of portraying a not-so perfect family people can relate to.



Mottyl: Mottyl is the cat and quite frankly the most likeable character in the story. She gives the perspective of the animals prior to the voyage and during the voyage. She is originally denied entry by Noah onto the ship, but is snuck onboard by Mrs. Noyes.



Mrs. Noyes: As the wife of Noah, she is a depressed alcoholic who is constantly being put down by Noah throughout the novel. She does spiteful things towards her husband, however she does have a good heart. She helps her daughter-in-law Emma see her family, she cherishes her cat's company, and she tries to save Emma's sister (though ultimately fails as Noah orders their son to kill her).


There are other secondary characters onboard the ship as well. Noah’s three sons Shem (described to be a worker with little opinion on any matters), Japeth (who has blue skin after an encounter with thieves), and Ham (who is wise and science-minded).


Each son has a wife who plays a significant role. Shem is married to Hannah who is favoured both by God and Noah. Her character is very pious though it is later discovered that she is carrying Noah’s child. Japeth is with Emma who is twelve years old. A major issue during the story is that they have yet to consummate the marriage after a year. Noah comes to a disturbing and horrifying solution on how to fix this problem. Finally, Ham begins the novel single, but discovers a woman in the forest shortly before the floods begin. Her name is “Lucy” and she is Lucifer in disguise. It is Findley’s way of getting Lucifer onboard the ark. Obviously there are still evils in this current world and therefore Lucifer had to have somehow made the journey. No one really questions when Ham decides to marry a mysterious seven-foot tall woman.


This story isn’t for truly devout Christians. At some parts it can be offensive and disturbing. It is a perspective of one man and is meant to be read as fiction. The story of Noah’s Ark in the Bible is actually very brief and this gives the reader a more personal view of the characters involved.

Monday, May 28, 2012

Turning 24...

Yesterday I turned 24. Really feel like I am starting to get old...

Reflections of being 23? The first half was a struggle, but ultimately it turned around in the last few months. Ended school...started school again. Lost A LOT of weight. Remembered how to be an athlete again. Started writing. Took up cake decorating. Learning everything I can about gardening. Just trying to enjoy life a little more. Hopefully I can continue to keep it all up to make 24 a memorable year.

So for my birthday, I made my own cupcakes. It sounds sad like no one loved me enough to get me a birthday cake, but I insisted to my mom that I really wanted to make my own birthday cupcakes.



Sugar Rose Cupcakes

Took the rose petals right out of my mom's vase




The sugar petals are extremely easy. It shocked a few people at the table to learn that they were real petals.
 There are a few different flowers that you are able to consume such as rose petals and pansies




Pansy Petals. Sugar petals are easy. Just clean and pat the petals dry.
Brush on egg white and sprinkle fine sugar. Let them dry for at least 3 hours.




Loved the little basket cupcake wrappers.




Buddy with the birthday girl.

Sunday, April 15, 2012

Rose Cake

This cake was made for my aunt's birthday. It was my first time making these roses, but it turned out to be very simple.




Roses were so simple. Just take a 1M tip and go around in a circle starting in the centre.



To make it look more like a rose just go over the outer layers of the rose so they look raised.



Doesn't have to be perfect because when it is completely covered it is hard to notice the mistakes.



Cupcakes work the exact same way with one single rose. I used Wilton Pink and Yellow Color Mist to create the colouring.




Got the idea from iambaker.net. Turned out to be a great cake.

Sunday, April 8, 2012

Cupcakes: Easter

For Easter dinner, I created a few new cupcakes. The Cadbury Creme Egg Cupcake I got off the Internet and the Vanilla Bunny Eggs Cupcakes I made up myself.


Cadbury Creme Egg Cupcakes
Pour a small amount of chocolate cake batter into large cupcake papers.
Place the FROZEN Cadbury Creme Eggs into the batter.



Cover the Cadbury Creme Eggs with batter. Bake according to box.

Cover the cupcake with icing. I dyed the icing yellow to make it look like an egg yolk.
Cap off the cupcake with a Mini Cadbury Creme Egg.


The baked Cadbury Creme Egg

Seeing double.

Final Product.


Vanilla Bunny Eggs Cupcakes


Use vanilla cupcake batter. For the nest, I used coconut mixed with maple syrup and bake them.
Top off with green buttercream icing and Mini Eggs.


Make sure you spray the pan before you bake the coconut nests because they
will stick.

Final Results


HAPPY EASTER!







Saturday, April 7, 2012

Movie: The Hunger Games


Movie: The Hunger Games
Director: Gary Ross
Release Date: March 23, 2012
Studio: Lionsgate
Starring: Jennifer Lawrence & Josh Hutcherson

After recently reviewing the novel The Hunger Games, I felt the need to review the film that just came out. I saw it opening night (no not with the crazy people who went at 12:01 am) and with the book fresh in my mind, there were things that I both liked and disliked in the film. If you haven’t seen the movie this might be a good time to stop reading this post. Though I don’t plan to give too much away, I will probably mention some things that might ruin the movie experience for you.

Now I have heard that a lot of people who haven’t read the books absolutely loved it. And to be honest, this does not surprise me. It seems that this book was written to one day become a film. I would also like to mention that I am not one of those fanatical “book to film” haters who completely trash any movie that is not line for line to the book. I know that films can’t be an eight-hour remake of the novel.

Likes:

1. Jennifer Lawrence plays the lead role of Katniss Everdeen, a sixteen-year-old girl from District 12 who offers herself up as tribute to replace her sister from a certain death. Lawrence’s portrayal of Katniss is how I imagined it. Her character is strong and a good example to other girls. She also looks way better with brown hair than she does in real-life as a blond. The role of Peeta was also portrayed very well. There was much criticism by super fans over the casting of Josh Hutcherson. He is shorter with dark brown hair, but the dye job was perfect (like Lawrence, maybe they should stick to their character’s hair colouring) and the best part is the kid can actually act. I have seen him in a few other roles and he does a great job. I was glad that he showed up all the people who doubted him. Some other notable roles were Woody Harrelson as Haymitch Abernathy, Elizabeth Banks as Effie Trinket, Stanley Tucci as Caesar Flickerman, and Wes Bentley as Seneca Crane.

2. In the book, the story is told from Katniss’ point of view. We hear her thoughts and see what she sees. Unlike the book, the movie couldn’t have the main character talking aloud and giving away her position in the Games. As a result, the director showed the point of view of the gamemakers to explain certain aspects of the Games. It was interesting to watch the gamemakers and really worked to the film’s advantage. It wasn’t in the book, but it became a great addition to the story.

3. Again, we are taken out of Katniss’ point of view and we are able to see what the audience is watching on the screen at home. With the colour commentary given by Caesar Flickerman, it gave the moviegoer a realistic view as someone from the audience. With all the reality television we are watching, it really drove home the idea that it was a television game. This lacked in the reading of the book.

4. The sets were extremely well done. They were just how I imagined them (except for the cornucopia). They didn’t skimp anywhere. The poverty of the districts, the elegance of the Capitol, and the arena’s forest were perfect.

5. The romantic scenes between Katniss and Peeta in the film were actually better then the ones in the book. Why? I think it might have been because again we aren’t in Katniss’ head during the film and don’t have to listen to her awkward back and forth. In the book, the reader is dying for Peeta because at some points she is acting for the cameras and other times, she is actually showing true feelings. In the film, the viewer feels like she might actually care for him and isn't playing a role.

Dislikes:

1. The director packed too much in the last 30 minutes of the film. I remember looking at my watch when Katniss discovers Peeta by the river and realizing that there were at least 100 pages of the book left with only 30 minutes of film to go. As a result, things got shortened or worse, they were completely cut out. There was a lot that happened in those last few pages.

2. Some scenes would have been worth omitting to give more time to more important parts. With all the back and forth of the Mockingjay pin, it may have just been easier to pay an actress to play the role of Madge. Her character isn’t that important, but it is more about what the pin represents in future books. I mean the last book is called Mockingjay.

3. There wasn’t enough time spent with little Rue. Katniss spends a few days with Rue, but her role in the film was really not much more than 10 minutes… maybe 15 minutes. I was a Rue fan so I would have liked to have seen more, but the little girl who portrayed her was great.

4. I didn’t like the depiction of the mutts. In the book, they are described as having the eyes of the dead tributes. That aspect of the book wasn’t even touched upon. Also with all the technology available in films today, I would have thought they would have been more realistic and life-like. I mean even real dogs would have been better. 

5. Overall, I was kind of left wanting more. It definitely wasn’t a bad book to film adaptation, but maybe I just went in expecting too much. Something was missing.

I think this will definitely be the most successful of the three films as this was the best of the three books. The other two books were great, but the author’s ideas weren’t as original as in the first novel.

Now that I have written about The Hunger Games for both the book and film, I will wait to review Catching Fire and the Mockingjay. Besides it will give me an excuse to read the series again.

Thursday, April 5, 2012

Book: Unjunk Your Junk Food



Book: Unjunk Your Junk Food
Authors: Andrea Donsky & Randy Boyer
Publisher: Gallery Books
Year: December 2011

Check out my book review for Unjunk Your Junk Food at AmericaJR.com
http://americajr.com/news/unjunkyourjunkfood0404.html
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...